Choosing between an
SDK or an
API seems like a 100% engineering decision. However, it affects users and product team experience, the overall development process, and time-to-market. Yet, conversations are difficult to follow for most non-technical people. Adding the complexity of voice recognition makes it even harder. For example, Google Speech-to-Text offers an
API, but Amazon Transcribe an
SDK for its
API. Then Amazon Transcribe offers
.NET SDK for batch transcription but not for streaming transcription. Which one is the best?
The short answer is: it depends. It depends on what you want to achieve and how.
APIs can work better if your goal is to access simple functionalities.
SDKs can fit better if it is to build efficient and native applications.
APIs offer flexibility and scalability. An application can interact with the
API provider, regardless of the programming language or platform. However, the benefits come with performance and governance risks.
Processing voice data via an
API incurs latency and performance drawbacks. Delays in
API calls and response times become a significant problem for mission-critical applications and when transmitting a large volume of data. In addition, any data transferred through an
API is vulnerable to data loss and corruption. Developers have to ensure data is shared and stored securely. A recent survey shows that 53% of data breaches were due to compromised API tokens.
SDKs provide direct access to the functionality, features, and libraries required for integration and development, allowing developers to use them within their applications.
SDKs also help enterprises with cost control during and after deployment. However,
SDKs have some risks, too.
First, make sure that your vendor supports the
SDK you need. For example, Amazon Transcribe does not offer a
.NET SDK for streaming transcriptions. However, if you have a
.NET application, your choices are re-writing the application, asking developers to code with a supported
SDK, hiring new developers who are more comfortable with supported
SDK or finding an efficient way to compile an existing
SDK. Thus, working with a vendor that offers a
.NET SDK is easier.
Picovoice supports all modern
SDKs, including Android, Angular, C, .NET, Flutter, Go, iOS, Java, NodeJS, React, React Native, Rust, Python, Unity, Vue, and WASM.
Second, remember that an
SDK can have an
API, which means your software may send voice data to a 3rd party application for processing. Thus, even using an
SDK cannot mitigate the performance and governance risks above, as in the case of Amazon Transcribe. A voice product built with Amazon Transcribe
SDK sends voice data to Amazon’s servers, then receives text data back without knowing what happens during transmission and transcription.
SDK is not the same. Both
SDK providers work hard on the developer experience. Ease-to-follow documentation is one aspect. As expected, some providers are more successful than others, affecting the allocated developer time.